Vote #72036
完了REST API for getting CustomField definitions
0%
説明
It would be helpful to have a possibility to query CustomFields for a certain type, since the customfield id and length/regex limitations might be necessary to create a valid REST API POST request.
One workaround to get the id of the customfield is to do a query for the resource first. E.g. for time_entries:
GET /time_entries.xml
will also return the customfields, but only if there is at least one time_entry in the database
If there is no time_entry yet, you can create a dummy one first (also via REST API), and delete that after you got the customfield ids. But this will not work if any of the customfields are mandatory.
This feature is probably related to Feature #9664
I suggest something like:
GET /custom_fields.xml?type=TimeEntryCustomField
which will result in the following response:
TimeEntryCustomField Text 5 5 [0-2][0-9]:[0-5][0-9] 1 TimeEntryCustomField List 0 First Second 0
journals
Since this probably takes a while, until it is integrated in redmine, I wrote a little webapp (in groovy, because I only have minimal ruby/redmine knowhow) to serve the customfields.
If anyone is interested they may have a look on github: https://github.com/rschobbert/redmine-customfield-info
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The project redmine-customfield-info on github has been deprecated in favor of the new project redmine-miss-api, which also serves the enumerations. The project can be found on github under: https://github.com/rschobbert/redmine-miss-api
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+1 too, as filtering is possible on the issues with (nnn being the field id),
<pre>
GET /issues.xml?cf_nnn=abcdef
</pre>
there should be at least a way to programmatically figure out what are the fields and which ids they have. (At the moment there is only a dirty workaround by examinating the contents of a ticket, by hoping the wanted fields are present)
My proposal would be to extend the @project@ query by adding one @include@ option (beside @issue_categories@ and @trackers@ also *@fields@* for example) For a first shot this does not need to be too complicated, having the field names, ids, tpyes and if they are required or not would be already great.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A patch for 'GET /custom_fields.xml' (without the filtering part) is available in #9664.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feature added in r12165. The response is slighty different from the proposal, see [[Rest_CustomFields]].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
what about CRUD for custom field definitions (http://www.redmine.org/issues/9664) ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
related_issues
relates,New,7819,REST API Populating issue field enumerations + Issue list filters
relates,New,9664,CRUD operations for "custom field definitions" (not setting custom fields on issues!)